Washbourne · ◉ direct ancestor
♂Roger Washbourne
Dates not yet known.
Roger Washbourne was a Worcestershire knight of the thirteenth century, the earliest known member of the knightly family that took its name from Washbourne, a township in the parish of Overbury. He was the twentieth great-grandfather of Nancy Jane Blanchard (1929–2006), through his son John Washbourne (died 1319).
Records of his life
Little is known of Sir Roger beyond that he flourished in the latter half of the century. In 1259 he was named in an inquisition concerning William de Stutevill, and in the subsidy rollW of 1280 he was assessed as of Little Comberton and of Washbourne, and also of Stanford, on the far side of Worcestershire some twenty-five miles away. He seems to have been still living in 1298–99, when a register of the bishopric of Worcester calls his son “Johannes de Dufford filius Rogeri de Washborn”.
Earlier men appear at Washbourne, among them William, son of Sampson, who held three hides there in the reign of Henry II, but the antiquary Thomas HabingtonW, writing about 1640, did not know how to join them to the family, and the College of ArmsW pedigrees of the Washbournes begin with Sir Roger. Habington counted “Sir Roger, Sir John, and Sir Roger Washborn, all Knightes before the raygne of Edward the thyrd”, and judged from their arms that they were descended from the “honorable houses of Zouche and Corbett”.
Lines of descent
The line from Roger runs through his son John and down the Washbourne family of Wichenford to John Washburn of Bengeworth (died 1547), who is probably John’s fifth great-grandson.
Notes
Sources
Roger is known from James Davenport’s The Washbourne Family of Little Washbourne and Wichenford (1907), pp. 1–3, where he is Sir Roger (1), the head of the pedigree and the grandfather of Sir Roger (3). Davenport draws on Habington’s notes on Worcestershire, which call the township of Knight’s Washbourne “the seate of Washborn’s knightly family”, and on the two College of Arms pedigrees, which begin with him. Phillimore gives 23 Henry III (1238–39) as Roger’s date. Davenport’s summary calls him “the first authentic Washbourne” and has him “living as late as 1299”, from the register of 27 Edward I in which his son appears as John de Dufford.
A wife named Joan
Davenport writes that the family’s connection with Stanford “possibly” came through “Sir Roger’s wife, Joan”. No record names her.
The descent below
That John Washburn of Bengeworth, who died in 1547, was the younger son of John Washbourne of Wichenford (died 1517) is Davenport’s identification, not a record’s, so the line from Roger to Nancy Jane Blanchard is probable below that generation.
Family time line
Parents not yet found. This line is still being traced.
Recorded events
| Event | When | Where | Evidence ?on record - the record itself, its image, or a transcript or printed copy of it has been read from a compiled source - an index, a printed genealogy or a memorial page says so not yet documented - in the family record, no source attached yet |
|---|---|---|---|
| Living at 'in the Lay Subsidy Roll of 1280 he is described as of Little Comberton and of Washbourne, as well as of Stanford.' (Davenport, The Washbourne Family of Little Washbourne and Wichenford (1907), p.3...) - compiled, no record seen |
abt 1280 | Little Washbourne, Overbury, Worcestershire, England | from a compiled source |
| Title (Nobility) Knight (Davenport, pp.3-9, 19-20 - Sir Roger (1) to John (6); Katherine Thromwin and Musa) |
from a compiled source |
Sources
- Davenport, James. The Washbourne Family of Little Washbourne and Wichenford, in the County of Worcester (London, 1907) (archive.org washbournefamily0000unse) — Living at, Title (Nobility), about this person, family
Borders as they stood about 1500, from the historical-basemaps project, the Newberry Library's Atlas of Historical County Boundaries (states and territories, 1783 on) and Natural Earth; the colonies and provinces are drawn along today's lines.